本文整理汇总了Java中javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth方法的典型用法代码示例。如果您正苦于以下问题：Java DatatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth方法的具体用法？Java DatatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth怎么用？Java DatatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth使用的例子？那么恭喜您, 这里精选的方法代码示例或许可以为您提供帮助。您也可以进一步了解该方法所在类javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory的用法示例。
在下文中一共展示了DatatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth方法的7个代码示例，这些例子默认根据受欢迎程度排序。您可以为喜欢或者感觉有用的代码点赞，您的评价将有助于系统推荐出更棒的Java代码示例。
示例1: test
import javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory; //导入方法依赖的package包/类
@Test
public void test() throws DatatypeConfigurationException {
DatatypeFactory dtf = DatatypeFactory.newInstance();
Duration d = dtf.newDurationYearMonth("P20Y15M");
int years = d.getYears();
System.out.println(d.getYears() == 21 ? "pass" : "fail");
}
示例2: testNewDurationYearMonthLexicalRepresentation
import javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory; //导入方法依赖的package包/类
@Test
public void testNewDurationYearMonthLexicalRepresentation() throws DatatypeConfigurationException {
DatatypeFactory dtf = DatatypeFactory.newInstance();
Duration d = dtf.newDurationYearMonth("P20Y15M");
int years = d.getYears();
Assert.assertTrue(years == 21, "Return value should be normalized");
}
示例3: testNewDurationYearMonthMilliseconds
import javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory; //导入方法依赖的package包/类
@Test
public void testNewDurationYearMonthMilliseconds() throws DatatypeConfigurationException {
DatatypeFactory dtf = DatatypeFactory.newInstance();
Duration d = dtf.newDurationYearMonth(671976000000L);
int years = d.getYears();
System.out.println("Years: " + years);
Assert.assertTrue(years == 21, "Return value should be normalized");
}
示例4: testNewDurationYearMonthBigInteger
import javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory; //导入方法依赖的package包/类
@Test
public void testNewDurationYearMonthBigInteger() throws DatatypeConfigurationException {
DatatypeFactory dtf = DatatypeFactory.newInstance();
BigInteger year = new BigInteger("20");
BigInteger mon = new BigInteger("15");
Duration d = dtf.newDurationYearMonth(true, year, mon);
int years = d.getYears();
Assert.assertTrue(years == 21, "Return value should be normalized");
}
示例5: testNewDurationYearMonthInt
import javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory; //导入方法依赖的package包/类
@Test
public void testNewDurationYearMonthInt() throws DatatypeConfigurationException {
DatatypeFactory dtf = DatatypeFactory.newInstance();
Duration d = dtf.newDurationYearMonth(true, 20, 15);
int years = d.getYears();
Assert.assertTrue(years == 21, "Return value should be normalized");
}
示例6: testNewDurationYearMonthLexicalRepresentation
import javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory; //导入方法依赖的package包/类
/**
* Test {@link DatatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth(String
* lexicalRepresentation)}.
*/
@Test
public final void testNewDurationYearMonthLexicalRepresentation() {
/**
* Lexical test values to test.
*/
final String[] TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL = { null, TEST_VALUE_FAIL, "", TEST_VALUE_FAIL, "-", TEST_VALUE_FAIL, "P", TEST_VALUE_FAIL, "-P", TEST_VALUE_FAIL,
"P1D", TEST_VALUE_FAIL, "P1Y1M1D", TEST_VALUE_FAIL, "P1M", "P1M", "-P1M", "-P1M", "P1Y", "P1Y", "-P1Y", "-P1Y", "P1Y1M", "P1Y1M", "-P1Y1M",
"-P1Y1M" };
DatatypeFactory datatypeFactory = null;
try {
datatypeFactory = DatatypeFactory.newInstance();
} catch (DatatypeConfigurationException datatypeConfigurationException) {
Assert.fail(datatypeConfigurationException.toString());
}
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("DatatypeFactory created: " + datatypeFactory.toString());
}
// test each value
for (int onTestValue = 0; onTestValue < TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL.length; onTestValue = onTestValue + 2) {
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("testing value: \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\", expecting: \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1] + "\"");
}
try {
Duration duration = datatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth(TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue]);
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("Duration created: \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
// was this expected to fail?
if (TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1].equals(TEST_VALUE_FAIL)) {
Assert.fail("the value \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\" is invalid yet it created the Duration \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
// right XMLSchemaType?
// TODO: enable test, it should pass, it fails with Exception(s)
// for now due to a bug
try {
QName xmlSchemaType = duration.getXMLSchemaType();
if (!xmlSchemaType.equals(DatatypeConstants.DURATION_YEARMONTH)) {
Assert.fail("Duration created with XMLSchemaType of\"" + xmlSchemaType + "\" was expected to be \""
+ DatatypeConstants.DURATION_YEARMONTH + "\" and has the value \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
} catch (IllegalStateException illegalStateException) {
// TODO; this test really should pass
System.err.println("Please fix this bug that is being ignored, for now: " + illegalStateException.getMessage());
}
// does it have the right value?
if (!TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1].equals(duration.toString())) {
Assert.fail("Duration created with \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\" was expected to be \""
+ TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1] + "\" and has the value \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
// Duration created with correct value
} catch (Exception exception) {
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("Exception in creating duration: \"" + exception.toString() + "\"");
}
// was this expected to succed?
if (!TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1].equals(TEST_VALUE_FAIL)) {
Assert.fail("the value \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\" is valid yet it failed with \"" + exception.toString() + "\"");
}
// expected failure
}
}
}
示例7: testNewDurationYearMonthLexicalRepresentation1
import javax.xml.datatype.DatatypeFactory; //导入方法依赖的package包/类
@Test
public final void testNewDurationYearMonthLexicalRepresentation1() {
/**
* Lexical test values to test.
*/
final String[] TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL = { "P13M", "P1Y1M", "-P13M", "-P1Y1M", "P1Y", "P1Y", "-P1Y", "-P1Y", "P1Y25M", "P3Y1M", "-P1Y25M", "-P3Y1M" };
DatatypeFactory datatypeFactory = null;
try {
datatypeFactory = DatatypeFactory.newInstance();
} catch (DatatypeConfigurationException datatypeConfigurationException) {
Assert.fail(datatypeConfigurationException.toString());
}
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("DatatypeFactory created: " + datatypeFactory.toString());
}
// test each value
for (int onTestValue = 0; onTestValue < TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL.length; onTestValue = onTestValue + 2) {
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("testing value: \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\", expecting: \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1] + "\"");
}
try {
Duration duration = datatypeFactory.newDurationYearMonth(TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue]);
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("Duration created: \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
// was this expected to fail?
if (TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1].equals(TEST_VALUE_FAIL)) {
Assert.fail("the value \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\" is invalid yet it created the Duration \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
// right XMLSchemaType?
// TODO: enable test, it should pass, it fails with Exception(s)
// for now due to a bug
try {
QName xmlSchemaType = duration.getXMLSchemaType();
if (!xmlSchemaType.equals(DatatypeConstants.DURATION_YEARMONTH)) {
Assert.fail("Duration created with XMLSchemaType of\"" + xmlSchemaType + "\" was expected to be \""
+ DatatypeConstants.DURATION_YEARMONTH + "\" and has the value \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
} catch (IllegalStateException illegalStateException) {
// TODO; this test really should pass
System.err.println("Please fix this bug that is being ignored, for now: " + illegalStateException.getMessage());
}
// does it have the right value?
if (!TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1].equals(duration.toString())) {
Assert.fail("Duration created with \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\" was expected to be \""
+ TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1] + "\" and has the value \"" + duration.toString() + "\"");
}
// Duration created with correct value
} catch (Exception exception) {
if (DEBUG) {
System.err.println("Exception in creating duration: \"" + exception.toString() + "\"");
}
// was this expected to succed?
if (!TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue + 1].equals(TEST_VALUE_FAIL)) {
Assert.fail("the value \"" + TEST_VALUES_LEXICAL[onTestValue] + "\" is valid yet it failed with \"" + exception.toString() + "\"");
}
// expected failure
}
}
}