Golang GCRequest.Keys方法代码示例

// process iterates through all keys in a replica's range, calling the garbage
// collector for each key and associated set of values. GC'd keys are batched
// into GC calls. Extant intents are resolved if intents are older than
// intentAgeThreshold. The transaction and abort cache records are also
// scanned and old entries evicted. During normal operation, both of these
// records are cleaned up when their respective transaction finishes, so the
// amount of work done here is expected to be small.
//
// Some care needs to be taken to avoid cyclic recreation of entries during GC:
// * a Push initiated due to an intent may recreate a transaction entry
// * resolving an intent may write a new abort cache entry
// * obtaining the transaction for a abort cache entry requires a Push
//
// The following order is taken below:
// 1) collect all intents with sufficiently old txn record
// 2) collect these intents' transactions
// 3) scan the transaction table, collecting abandoned or completed txns
// 4) push all of these transactions (possibly recreating entries)
// 5) resolve all intents (unless the txn is still PENDING), which will recreate
//    abort cache entries (but with the txn timestamp; i.e. likely gc'able)
// 6) scan the abort cache table for old entries
// 7) push these transactions (again, recreating txn entries).
// 8) send a GCRequest.
func (gcq *gcQueue) process(
	ctx context.Context,
	now hlc.Timestamp,
	repl *Replica,
	sysCfg config.SystemConfig,
) error {
	snap := repl.store.Engine().NewSnapshot()
	desc := repl.Desc()
	defer snap.Close()

	// Lookup the GC policy for the zone containing this key range.
	zone, err := sysCfg.GetZoneConfigForKey(desc.StartKey)
	if err != nil {
		return errors.Errorf("could not find zone config for range %s: %s", repl, err)
	}

	gcKeys, info, err := RunGC(ctx, desc, snap, now, zone.GC,
		func(now hlc.Timestamp, txn *roachpb.Transaction, typ roachpb.PushTxnType) {
			pushTxn(gcq.store.DB(), now, txn, typ)
		},
		func(intents []roachpb.Intent, poison bool, wait bool) error {
			return repl.store.intentResolver.resolveIntents(ctx, intents, poison, wait)
		})

	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	gcq.eventLog.VInfof(true, "completed with stats %+v", info)

	var ba roachpb.BatchRequest
	var gcArgs roachpb.GCRequest
	// TODO(tschottdorf): This is one of these instances in which we want
	// to be more careful that the request ends up on the correct Replica,
	// and we might have to worry about mixing range-local and global keys
	// in a batch which might end up spanning Ranges by the time it executes.
	gcArgs.Key = desc.StartKey.AsRawKey()
	gcArgs.EndKey = desc.EndKey.AsRawKey()
	gcArgs.Keys = gcKeys
	gcArgs.Threshold = info.Threshold

	// Technically not needed since we're talking directly to the Range.
	ba.RangeID = desc.RangeID
	ba.Timestamp = now
	ba.Add(&gcArgs)
	if _, pErr := repl.Send(ctx, ba); pErr != nil {
		return pErr.GoError()
	}
	return nil
}

// processIntentsAsync asynchronously processes intents which were
// encountered during another command but did not interfere with the
// execution of that command. This occurs in two cases: inconsistent
// reads and EndTransaction (which queues its own external intents for
// processing via this method). The two cases are handled somewhat
// differently and would be better served by different entry points,
// but combining them simplifies the plumbing necessary in Replica.
func (ir *intentResolver) processIntentsAsync(r *Replica, intents []intentsWithArg) {
	if len(intents) == 0 {
		return
	}
	now := r.store.Clock().Now()
	ctx := r.context(context.TODO())
	stopper := r.store.Stopper()

	for _, item := range intents {
		if item.args.Method() != roachpb.EndTransaction {
			stopper.RunLimitedAsyncTask(ir.sem, func() {
				// Everything here is best effort; give up rather than waiting
				// too long (helps avoid deadlocks during test shutdown,
				// although this is imperfect due to the use of an
				// uninterruptible WaitGroup.Wait in beginCmds).
				ctxWithTimeout, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, base.NetworkTimeout)
				defer cancel()
				h := roachpb.Header{Timestamp: now}
				resolveIntents, pushErr := ir.maybePushTransactions(ctxWithTimeout,
					item.intents, h, roachpb.PUSH_TOUCH, true /* skipInFlight */)

				// resolveIntents with poison=true because we're resolving
				// intents outside of the context of an EndTransaction.
				//
				// Naively, it doesn't seem like we need to poison the abort
				// cache since we're pushing with PUSH_TOUCH - meaning that
				// the primary way our Push leads to aborting intents is that
				// of the transaction having timed out (and thus presumably no
				// client being around any more, though at the time of writing
				// we don't guarantee that). But there's another path in which
				// the Push comes back successful, namely that of the
				// transaction already having been aborted by someone else, in
				// which case the client may still be running. Thus, we must
				// poison.
				if err := ir.resolveIntents(ctxWithTimeout, r, resolveIntents,
					true /* wait */, true /* poison */); err != nil {
					log.Warningc(ctxWithTimeout, "failed to resolve intents: %s", err)
					return
				}
				if pushErr != nil {
					log.Warningc(ctxWithTimeout, "failed to push during intent resolution: %s", pushErr)
					return
				}
			})
		} else { // EndTransaction
			stopper.RunLimitedAsyncTask(ir.sem, func() {
				ctxWithTimeout, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, base.NetworkTimeout)
				defer cancel()

				// For EndTransaction, we know the transaction is finalized so
				// we can skip the push and go straight to the resolve.
				//
				// This mechanism assumes that when an EndTransaction fails,
				// the client makes no assumptions about the result. For
				// example, an attempt to explicitly rollback the transaction
				// may succeed (triggering this code path), but the result may
				// not make it back to the client.
				if err := ir.resolveIntents(ctxWithTimeout, r, item.intents,
					true /* wait */, false /* !poison */); err != nil {
					log.Warningc(ctxWithTimeout, "failed to resolve intents: %s", err)
					return
				}

				// We successfully resolved the intents, so we're able to GC from
				// the txn span directly.
				var ba roachpb.BatchRequest
				ba.Timestamp = now

				txn := item.intents[0].Txn
				gcArgs := roachpb.GCRequest{
					Span: roachpb.Span{
						Key:    r.Desc().StartKey.AsRawKey(),
						EndKey: r.Desc().EndKey.AsRawKey(),
					},
				}
				gcArgs.Keys = append(gcArgs.Keys, roachpb.GCRequest_GCKey{
					Key: keys.TransactionKey(txn.Key, txn.ID),
				})
				ba.Add(&gcArgs)
				if _, pErr := r.addWriteCmd(ctxWithTimeout, ba, nil /* nil */); pErr != nil {
					log.Warningf("could not GC completed transaction: %s", pErr)
				}
			})
		}
	}
}

//.........这里部分代码省略.........
				resolveIntents, pushErr := ir.maybePushTransactions(ctxWithTimeout,
					item.intents, h, roachpb.PUSH_TOUCH, true /* skipInFlight */)

				// resolveIntents with poison=true because we're resolving
				// intents outside of the context of an EndTransaction.
				//
				// Naively, it doesn't seem like we need to poison the abort
				// cache since we're pushing with PUSH_TOUCH - meaning that
				// the primary way our Push leads to aborting intents is that
				// of the transaction having timed out (and thus presumably no
				// client being around any more, though at the time of writing
				// we don't guarantee that). But there's another path in which
				// the Push comes back successful, namely that of the
				// transaction already having been aborted by someone else, in
				// which case the client may still be running. Thus, we must
				// poison.
				if err := ir.resolveIntents(ctxWithTimeout, resolveIntents,
					true /* wait */, true /* poison */); err != nil {
					log.Warningf(context.TODO(), "%s: failed to resolve intents: %s", r, err)
					return
				}
				if pushErr != nil {
					log.Warningf(context.TODO(), "%s: failed to push during intent resolution: %s", r, pushErr)
					return
				}
			}); err != nil {
				log.Warningf(context.TODO(), "failed to resolve intents: %s", err)
				return
			}
		} else { // EndTransaction
			if err := stopper.RunLimitedAsyncTask(ir.sem, func() {
				ctxWithTimeout, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, base.NetworkTimeout)
				defer cancel()

				// For EndTransaction, we know the transaction is finalized so
				// we can skip the push and go straight to the resolve.
				//
				// This mechanism assumes that when an EndTransaction fails,
				// the client makes no assumptions about the result. For
				// example, an attempt to explicitly rollback the transaction
				// may succeed (triggering this code path), but the result may
				// not make it back to the client.
				if err := ir.resolveIntents(ctxWithTimeout, item.intents,
					true /* wait */, false /* !poison */); err != nil {
					log.Warningf(context.TODO(), "%s: failed to resolve intents: %s", r, err)
					return
				}

				// We successfully resolved the intents, so we're able to GC from
				// the txn span directly.
				b := &client.Batch{}
				txn := item.intents[0].Txn
				txnKey := keys.TransactionKey(txn.Key, txn.ID)

				// This is pretty tricky. Transaction keys are range-local and
				// so they are encoded specially. The key range addressed by
				// (txnKey, txnKey.Next()) might be empty (since Next() does
				// not imply monotonicity on the address side). Instead, we
				// send this request to a range determined using the resolved
				// transaction anchor, i.e. if the txn is anchored on
				// /Local/RangeDescriptor/"a"/uuid, the key range below would
				// be ["a", "a\x00"). However, the first range is special again
				// because the above procedure results in KeyMin, but we need
				// at least KeyLocalMax.
				//
				// #7880 will address this by making GCRequest less special and
				// thus obviating the need to cook up an artificial range here.
				var gcArgs roachpb.GCRequest
				{
					key := keys.MustAddr(txn.Key)
					if localMax := keys.MustAddr(keys.LocalMax); key.Less(localMax) {
						key = localMax
					}
					endKey := key.Next()

					gcArgs.Span = roachpb.Span{
						Key:    key.AsRawKey(),
						EndKey: endKey.AsRawKey(),
					}
				}

				gcArgs.Keys = append(gcArgs.Keys, roachpb.GCRequest_GCKey{
					Key: txnKey,
				})
				b.AddRawRequest(&gcArgs)
				if err := ir.store.db.Run(b); err != nil {
					log.Warningf(
						context.TODO(),
						"could not GC completed transaction anchored at %s: %s",
						roachpb.Key(txn.Key), err,
					)
					return
				}
			}); err != nil {
				log.Warningf(context.TODO(), "failed to resolve intents: %s", err)
				return
			}
		}
	}
}

// processIntentsAsync asynchronously processes intents which were
// encountered during another command but did not interfere with the
// execution of that command. This occurs in two cases: inconsistent
// reads and EndTransaction (which queues its own external intents for
// processing via this method). The two cases are handled somewhat
// differently and would be better served by different entry points,
// but combining them simplifies the plumbing necessary in Replica.
func (ir *intentResolver) processIntentsAsync(r *Replica, intents []intentsWithArg) {
	if len(intents) == 0 {
		return
	}
	now := r.store.Clock().Now()
	ctx := r.context()
	stopper := r.store.Stopper()

	for _, item := range intents {
		if item.args.Method() != roachpb.EndTransaction {
			stopper.RunLimitedAsyncTask(ir.sem, func() {
				// Everything here is best effort; give up rather than waiting
				// too long (helps avoid deadlocks during test shutdown,
				// although this is imperfect due to the use of an
				// uninterruptible WaitGroup.Wait in beginCmds).
				ctxWithTimeout, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, base.NetworkTimeout)
				defer cancel()
				h := roachpb.Header{Timestamp: now}
				resolveIntents, pushErr := ir.maybePushTransactions(ctxWithTimeout,
					item.intents, h, roachpb.PUSH_TOUCH, true /* skipInFlight */)
				if pErr := ir.resolveIntents(ctxWithTimeout, r, resolveIntents,
					true /* wait */, false /* TODO(tschottdorf): #5088 */); pErr != nil {
					log.Warningc(ctxWithTimeout, "failed to resolve intents: %s", pErr)
					return
				}
				if pushErr != nil {
					log.Warningc(ctxWithTimeout, "failed to push during intent resolution: %s", pushErr)
					return
				}
			})
		} else { // EndTransaction
			stopper.RunLimitedAsyncTask(ir.sem, func() {
				ctxWithTimeout, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, base.NetworkTimeout)
				defer cancel()

				// For EndTransaction, we know the transaction is finalized so
				// we can skip the push and go straight to the resolve.
				if pErr := ir.resolveIntents(ctxWithTimeout, r, item.intents,
					true /* wait */, false /* TODO(tschottdorf): #5088 */); pErr != nil {
					log.Warningc(ctxWithTimeout, "failed to resolve intents: %s", pErr)
					return
				}

				// We successfully resolved the intents, so we're able to GC from
				// the txn span directly. Note that the sequence cache was cleared
				// out synchronously with EndTransaction (see comments within for
				// an explanation of why that is kosher).
				//
				// Note that we poisoned the sequence caches on the external ranges
				// above. This may seem counter-intuitive, but it's actually
				// necessary: Assume a transaction has committed here, with two
				// external intents, and assume that we did not poison. Normally,
				// these two intents would be resolved in the same batch, but that
				// is not guaranteed (for example, if DistSender has a stale
				// descriptor after a Merge). When resolved separately, the first
				// ResolveIntent would clear out the sequence cache; an individual
				// write on the second (still present) intent could then be
				// replayed and would resolve to a real value (at least for a
				// window of time unless we delete the local txn entry). That's not
				// OK for non-idempotent commands such as Increment.
				// TODO(tschottdorf): We should have another side effect on
				// MVCCResolveIntent (on commit/abort): If it were able to remove
				// the txn from its corresponding entries in the timestamp cache,
				// no more replays at the same timestamp would be possible. This
				// appears to be a useful performance optimization; we could then
				// not poison on EndTransaction. In fact, the above mechanism
				// could be an effective alternative to sequence-cache based
				// poisoning (or the whole sequence cache?) itself.
				//
				// TODO(tschottdorf): down the road, can probably unclog the system
				// here by batching up a bunch of those GCRequests before proposing.
				var ba roachpb.BatchRequest
				txn := item.intents[0].Txn
				gcArgs := roachpb.GCRequest{
					Span: roachpb.Span{
						Key:    r.Desc().StartKey.AsRawKey(),
						EndKey: r.Desc().EndKey.AsRawKey(),
					},
				}
				gcArgs.Keys = append(gcArgs.Keys, roachpb.GCRequest_GCKey{
					Key: keys.TransactionKey(txn.Key, txn.ID),
				})
				ba.Add(&gcArgs)
				if _, pErr := r.addWriteCmd(ctxWithTimeout, ba, nil /* nil */); pErr != nil {
					log.Warningf("could not GC completed transaction: %s", pErr)
				}
			})
		}
	}
}