本文整理汇总了C++中Proc::type方法的典型用法代码示例。如果您正苦于以下问题：C++ Proc::type方法的具体用法？C++ Proc::type怎么用？C++ Proc::type使用的例子？那么, 这里精选的方法代码示例或许可以为您提供帮助。您也可以进一步了解该方法所在类Proc的用法示例。
在下文中一共展示了Proc::type方法的1个代码示例，这些例子默认根据受欢迎程度排序。您可以为喜欢或者感觉有用的代码点赞，您的评价将有助于系统推荐出更棒的C++代码示例。
示例1: if
void
BinUtil::TextSeg::ctor_initProcs()
{
Dbg::LM* dbgInfo = m_lm->getDebugInfo();
// Any procedure with a parent has a <Proc*, parentVMA> entry
std::map<Proc*, VMA> parentMap;
// ------------------------------------------------------------
// Each text section finds and creates its own routines.
// Traverse the symbol table (which is sorted by VMA) searching
// for function symbols in our section. Create a Proc for
// each one found.
//
// Note that symbols can appear multiple times (e.g. a weak symbol
// 'sbrk' along with a gloabl symbol '__sbrk'), but we should not
// have multiple procedures.
// ------------------------------------------------------------
bfd* abfd = m_lm->abfd();
asymbol** symtab = m_lm->bfdSymTab(); // sorted
uint symtabSz = m_lm->bfdSymTabSz();
// FIXME:PERF: exploit sortedness of 'symtab' to start iteration
for (uint i = 0; i < symtabSz; i++) {
asymbol* sym = symtab[i];
if (isIn(bfd_asymbol_value(sym)) && Proc::isProcBFDSym(sym)) {
// NOTE: initially we have [begVMA, endVMA) where endVMA is the
// *end* of the last insn. This is changed after decoding below.
VMA begVMA = bfd_asymbol_value(sym);
VMA endVMA = 0;
Proc::Type procType;
if (sym->flags & BSF_LOCAL) {
procType = Proc::Local;
}
else if (sym->flags & BSF_WEAK) {
procType = Proc::Weak;
}
else if (sym->flags & BSF_GLOBAL) {
procType = Proc::Global;
}
else {
procType = Proc::Unknown;
}
Proc* proc = m_lm->findProc(begVMA);
if (proc) {
DIAG_Assert(proc->begVMA() == begVMA, "TextSeg::ctor_initProcs: Procedure beginning at 0x" << hex << begVMA << " overlaps with:\n" << proc->toString());
if (procType == Proc::Global) {
// 'global' types take precedence
proc->type(procType);
}
continue;
}
// Create a procedure based on best information we have. We
// always prefer explicit debug information over that inferred
// from the symbol table.
string procNm;
string symNm = bfd_asymbol_name(sym);
Dbg::LM::iterator it = dbgInfo->find(begVMA);
Dbg::Proc* dbg = (it != dbgInfo->end()) ? it->second : NULL;
if (!dbg) {
procNm = findProcName(abfd, sym);
string pnm = BinUtil::canonicalizeProcName(procNm);
Dbg::LM::iterator1 it1 = dbgInfo->find1(pnm);
dbg = (it1 != dbgInfo->end1()) ? it1->second : NULL;
}
if (!dbg) {
Dbg::LM::iterator1 it1 = dbgInfo->find1(symNm);
dbg = (it1 != dbgInfo->end1()) ? it1->second : NULL;
}
// Finding the end VMA (end of last insn). The computation is
// as follows because sometimes the debug information is
// *wrong*. (Intel 9 has generated significant over-estimates).
//
// N.B. exploits the fact that the symbol table is sorted by vma
VMA endVMA_approx = findProcEnd(i);
if (dbg) {
if (!dbg->name.empty()) {
procNm = dbg->name;
}
else if (!symNm.empty()) {
// sometimes a procedure name is in the symbol table even
// though it is not in the dwarf section. this case occurs
// when gcc outlines routines from OpenMP parallel sections.
procNm = symNm;
}
#if 1
// Remove capability below... the DWARF sizes can be wrong!!
endVMA = endVMA_approx;
#else
endVMA = std::min(dbg->endVMA, endVMA_approx);
//.........这里部分代码省略.........