本文整理匯總了Golang中fubsy/types.FuObject.ValueString方法的典型用法代碼示例。如果您正苦於以下問題：Golang FuObject.ValueString方法的具體用法？Golang FuObject.ValueString怎麽用？Golang FuObject.ValueString使用的例子？那麽, 這裏精選的方法代碼示例或許可以為您提供幫助。您也可以進一步了解該方法所在類fubsy/types.FuObject的用法示例。
在下文中一共展示了FuObject.ValueString方法的3個代碼示例，這些例子默認根據受歡迎程度排序。您可以為喜歡或者感覺有用的代碼點讚，您的評價將有助於係統推薦出更棒的Golang代碼示例。
示例1: assertExpand
func assertExpand(
t *testing.T, ns types.Namespace, expect []string, obj types.FuObject) {
if ns == nil {
ns = types.NewValueMap()
}
actualobj, err := obj.ActionExpand(ns, nil)
assert.Nil(t, err)
// convert FuList of FileNode to slice of string
actualstr := make([]string, len(actualobj.List()))
for i, obj := range actualobj.List() {
actualstr[i] = obj.ValueString()
}
assert.Equal(t, expect, actualstr)
}示例2: Test_BuildRule_setLocals
func Test_BuildRule_setLocals(t *testing.T) {
targets := []dag.Node{dag.NewStubNode("foo")}
sources := []dag.Node{dag.NewStubNode("bar"), dag.NewStubNode("qux")}
ns := types.NewValueMap()
rule := NewBuildRule(nil, targets, sources)
rule.setLocals(ns)
var val types.FuObject
var ok bool
val, ok = ns.Lookup("whatever")
assert.False(t, ok)
val, ok = ns.Lookup("target")
assert.False(t, ok)
val, ok = ns.Lookup("targets")
assert.False(t, ok)
val, ok = ns.Lookup("TARGET")
assert.True(t, ok)
assert.Equal(t, "foo", val.ValueString())
assert.Equal(t, "foo", val.(*dag.StubNode).Name())
val, ok = ns.Lookup("SOURCE")
assert.True(t, ok)
assert.Equal(t, "bar", val.ValueString())
assert.Equal(t, "bar", val.(*dag.StubNode).Name())
val, ok = ns.Lookup("TARGETS")
assert.True(t, ok)
assert.Equal(t, 1, len(val.List()))
assert.Equal(t, `["foo"]`, val.String())
val, ok = ns.Lookup("SOURCES")
assert.True(t, ok)
assert.Equal(t, 2, len(val.List()))
assert.Equal(t, `["bar", "qux"]`, val.String())
}示例3: nodify
// Convert a single FuObject (possibly a FuList) to a list of Nodes and
// add them to the DAG.
func (self *Runtime) nodify(values types.FuObject) []dag.Node {
// Blecchh: specially handling every type here limits the
// extensibility of the type system. But I don't want each type to
// know how it becomes a node, because then the 'types' package
// depends on 'dag', which seems backwards to me. Hmmmm.
var result []dag.Node
switch values := values.(type) {
case types.FuString:
result = []dag.Node{dag.MakeFileNode(self.dag, values.ValueString())}
case types.FuList:
result = make([]dag.Node, 0, len(values.List()))
for _, val := range values.List() {
result = append(result, self.nodify(val)...)
}
case *dag.ListNode:
result = values.Nodes()
for i, node := range result {
result[i] = self.dag.AddNode(node)
}
case dag.Node:
result = []dag.Node{self.dag.AddNode(values)}
}
return result
}